Calculating the Effective Lens Position

effective lens position of iol power calculations

Reducing your prediction error to a minimum.

Dr. Holladay first published the quadratic solution to the axial length vergence formula in 1993 for the effective lens position, or ELPo, previously referred to as the anterior chamber depth, or ACD.

Determining the ELPo allows you to calculate the optimal, or “personalized” lens position based on your individual experience with any style lens, averaged ideally from 20 to 30 cases. You can then use this figure with the IOL power calculation formulas. Details on this topic can be found in the following two articles listed below, which are highly recommended:

  • Holladay JT: Refractive Power Calculations for Intraocular Lenses in the Phakic Eye. AJO 1993; 116: 63-66
  • Holladay JT: Standardizing constants for ultrasonic biometry, keratometry, and intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997; 23: 1356 – 1370

A nice feature of the Holladay IOL Consultant is that it performs this calculation automatically, with updates as outcomes are entered. For those who do not yet have this software, determining the ELPo is a valuable exercise, as it reduces your prediction error to a minimum. Follow this link to view an example of how to set up an ELP Spreadsheet for tracking outcomes.

Below is a step-by-step outline:

Step 1:

The ultrasonic axial length (ALu) for each case must be converted to the optical axial length (ALo). This correction accounts for the difference between the location of the secondary principal plane of the cornea (Pc2 = +0.05 mm) and the thickness of the retina, specifically the distance between the vitreoretinal interface and the visual cell layer (Rt = +0.25 mm).

Step 2:

The keratometric power of the cornea (Kk) for each case must be converted to the net optical power of the cornea (Ko). This correction accounts for the fact that the non-physiologic standardized keratometric index of refraction (established more than 100 years ago) is 1.3375. In contrast, the true physiologic corneal index of refraction is 1.3333, or 4/3.

Step 3:

The following equations are Holladay’s reverse solution to the axial length vergence formula for the ELPo. This assumes that the following are known: the postoperative keratometry (Kk), the preoperative axial length (ALu), the stabilized actual postoperative refraction (APostRx), the vertex distance (V), and the power of the implanted intraocular lens (IOLe). For plus power IOLs, the sign in front of the square root is negative, and for minus power IOLs (as would be implanted in the setting of high to extreme myopia), the sign in front of the square root is positive.

Examples:

Example 1 – Capsular Bag Placement

Below is an example of the calculated postoperative ELPo for the Alcon MA60BM acrylic posterior chamber intraocular lens placed within the capsular bag. The corrected ultrasonic axial length (ALo = 22.28 + 0.20) is 22.48 mm, the postoperative refraction ( APostRx ) at six weeks is -0.50 D, the vertex distance ( V ) is 12.0 mm, and the postoperative keratometry is 46.87 / 46.50 x 090. The power of the implanted lens ( IOLe ) is +22.50 D.

Example 2 – Ciliary Sulcus Placement

Below is an example of the calculated postoperative ELPo for the Alcon MA60BM acrylic posterior chamber intraocular lens that has been implanted into the sulcus. The corrected ultrasonic axial length (ALo = 22.28 + 0.20) is 22.48 mm, the postoperative refraction ( APostRx ) at six weeks is -1.375 D, the vertex distance ( V ) is 12.0 mm, and the postoperative keratometry is 46.87 / 46.50 x 090. The power of the implanted lens ( IOLe ) is +22.50 D. Note that even though all parameters have remained the same as the previous example, the more anterior position of the IOL in the sulcus has resulted in a greater degree of myopia.